Decorated Met Police officer’s child abuse video conviction appeal refused | London

A highly-decorated police officer’s attraction in opposition to her conviction for having a toddler abuse video on her telephone has been refused by the Courtroom of Enchantment.

Novlett Robyn Williams, 56, who was counseled for her work after the Grenfell Tower catastrophe, was sentenced to 200 hours of neighborhood service for possession of an indecent picture in November 2019.

Her trial on the Outdated Bailey heard that Williams obtained the video through WhatsApp from her older sister Jennifer Hodge, 57, who had initially been despatched the clip by her long-term boyfriend, 63-year-old Dido Massivi.

Williams – who has since been sacked with out discover by the Metropolitan Police for “gross misconduct” – appealed in opposition to each her conviction and her sentence at a listening to on Thursday.

She attended the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Thursday morning for her attraction, as did Hodge and Massivi who additionally difficult their convictions.

On the conclusion of the listening to, Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting with Mr Justice Sweeney and Mrs Justice Ellenbogen, refused the entire appeals.

The choose mentioned: “The functions made on behalf of all three appellants on this case are refused for causes which will likely be handed down later.”

Williams’ barrister Anesta Weekes QC earlier instructed the courtroom there was “not even a suggestion” that her consumer had watched the 54-second video and that she was “the one one” of the recipients who had not watched it.

She mentioned the case in opposition to Williams at trial was that “there was a transparent picture and also you had been taking a look at a thumbnail for some 12 seconds, so it’s essential to have seen that indecent picture”.

Ms Weekes instructed the courtroom that professional proof advised that “the picture had been sufficiently downloaded and the consultants mentioned ‘it’s our view that the picture would have been clear’”.

However Ms Weekes mentioned that the consultants weren’t capable of correctly look at Williams’ telephone, including: “There is a component of unfairness right here if you don’t even have the very telephone and you can not show on the telephone … how clear it (the thumbnail) can be.”

Richard Wright QC, for the Crown, mentioned: “The consultants had been plainly not giving proof about what Ms Williams did see.

“They had been giving proof about what was current on her telephone to be seen and that was the central situation within the case and one which required professional proof to reconstruct the thumbnail, its readability, its measurement and the way it might have appeared within the absence of the unique thumbnail.”

On the trial, the Outdated Bailey heard that Williams had an exemplary disciplinary report and was extremely regarded for her work each within the aftermath of Grenfell and at successive Notting Hill Carnivals.

She was awarded the Queen’s Police Medal for distinguished service in 2003.

Williams confronted a second cost, of corrupt or improper train of police powers and privilege by failing to inform officers concerning the video, however was discovered not responsible of this cost.

Hodge, of Brent in north-west London, was discovered responsible of distributing an indecent picture of a kid, actions she instructed the courtroom had been meant to search out the abuser accountable and was sentenced to 100 hours of neighborhood service.

Massivi, additionally of Brent, was convicted of two counts of distributing an indecent {photograph} of a kid, and one rely of possessing an excessive pornographic picture portraying an individual having intercourse with a horse.

He was handed an 18-month sentence for every offence to run concurrently and suspended for 2 years. He was additionally ordered to hold out 200 hours of neighborhood service.

Recommended For You