Councillors unanimously opposed plans for a housing development north of Biggleswade this week.
Biggleswade Town Council will formally object to the planning application for up to 416 homes on a 43-acre site, it was decided in a meeting on August 24.
However, the final decision will be made by Central Bedfordshire Council’s (CBC) development management committee in due course.
Read also: Police close Biggleswade property after reports of drug dealing and violence
There have been three petitions opposing the outline proposals, according to the planning notice on CBC’s website, as well as 1,412 representations against it, 15 in favour and six general comments.
Applicant Hallam Land Management asked for its development brief for land north of Biggleswade, with access from Furzenhall Road, to be put on hold in March 2020.
The project includes affordable housing, allotments, a community orchard, public open space, children’s play area, parking, cycleways and footpaths, and landscaping.
Open land lies north of the site, with the East Coast Main Line to the west and housing accessed from Potton Road to the east.
If you’re looking for a way to stay up to date with the latest breaking news from around Bedfordshire, the new BedfordshireLive newsletter is a good place to start.
The daily update will deliver the top news and features to your inbox.
We choose the most important stories of the day to include in the newsletter, including crime, court news, long reads, traffic and travel, food and drink articles and more.
Signing up to the newsletter is simple. All you have to do is to click here and type in your email address.
It’s one of the many ways that you can read the news that matters to you from BedfordshireLive.
Deputy mayor Grant Fage told a town council meeting: “It was over 18 months ago we first started to see the detail of this application.
“There has been a back and forth between us and our planning consultant as and when further documentation has become available,” he explained.
“The objection highlights the most material areas which ourselves and the consultants agree are the things planning officers should be caring about the most.
“We could have probably come up with a list of 20 to 30 things we dislike about this scheme, but we picked out those which are the most impactful.
“Firstly, there’s the terrible access down Furzenhall Road and the applicant’s inability to deal with parked cars.
“Secondly, the very poor analysis they’ve done over the junctions between Shortmead Street and Sun Street and between Drove Road and London Road.
“And also there’s the disruption caused to and the impact on several monuments and potentially nationally important archaeology on that site.
“I’d like backing for sending that to CBC as our official response to the planning application,” he added.
“I’d like to request that we ask CBC to put this response and that of Sandy Town Council on the planning portal, so it’s accessible to others.
“We should also ask for our technical audit to go on the portal, as it seems to have mysteriously disappeared.
“And we should ask Central Beds to do more work over the Grove Road junction with London Road, which is already over capacity.”
Councillor Mark Knight described it as “an excellent response”, asking whether it could include “a reference to the dangerous and narrow nature of footpaths on the Potton Road railway bridge.”
Mayor Madeline Russell summarised the recommendation, saying: “This paper should be the formal response from the town council to the plans.
“We’re to add a note about the footpaths on Potton Road bridge, request various documents go on the planning portal, and ask for CBC’s consultants to analyse the Grove Road and London Road junction.”
Councillors unanimously agreed to the recommendation with the additions.
Want more news direct to your inbox? Sign up for our daily newsletter here.