A brand new information examine analyzing the hygiene scores of chicken shops in each London borough has mapped your probabilities of getting hygienic meals (or not) when selecting certainly one of London’s hottest take away meals.
The examine, which compiled the Food Standards Authority (FSA) hygiene scores of quite a few registered chicken shops throughout each London borough, gave every borough a “risk-o-meter” rating based mostly on the typical hygiene rating (1 being the bottom, 5 the best).
It confirmed that Richmond, one of many capital’s most prosperous boroughs, in reality had the bottom common hygiene scores of any borough in London, although that was based mostly on the one registered chicken store there included in the examine, which had a hygiene rating of 1.
Richmond’s ‘risk-o-meter’ was consequently a frightening 80 per cent.
The examine was compiled by ‘Casino’, who additionally printed an emoji-laden map with their information to assist monitor one of the best and worst chicken shops by London borough at a look.
Screenshot by way of on line casino.co.uk
Their information confirmed that Havering got here prime, with a median hygiene rating of 4.5, and a correspondingly low danger issue of simply 10 per cent.
Strong performers in south east London included Bromley (common 4.1, danger 17 per cent), Greenwich (common 3.9, danger 22 per cent) and Bexley (common 3.4, danger 33 per cent).
In south west London, one of the best exhibiting got here from Merton (common 3.2, danger 35 per cent), adopted by Wandsworth (common 3.1, danger 38 per cent) and Sutton (common 3.0, danger 40 per cent).
Meanwhile Croydon scored a median of two.9 and a danger of 41 per cent, and Kingston a median hygiene rating of two.5 and a risk-o-meter rating of fifty per cent.
“In England, it’s non-compulsory for a restaurant or takeaway to show an FSA rating at its bodily location. Instead, all scores can be found on the FSA’s web site,” Fiona Sinclair, the director at STS Food Safety, mentioned following the report.
“When ordering meals from Deliveroo and Uber Eats, the apps present no point out of the scores. This signifies that it’s right down to the shopper to do their analysis earlier than tucking right into a chicken burger or kebab.
“The fantastic thing about this technique is that meals companies which aren’t as much as scratch have nowhere to cover.
“The info is public for all to see and unhealthy practices can not be saved behind closed doorways, particularly in lately of social media. There is nowhere for a meals enterprise to cover if they’re given a failing rating,” she added.
Here’s the total listing:
