Karakusevic Carson’s ‘oppressive’ east London towers rejected

The follow submitted plans for Part 3 of Bow River Village, a improvement alongside the River Lea south of Bow Roundabout, on behalf of housing affiliation Southern Housing Group in 2019.

The three brick towers would every have stood at 26 storeys, or 99m, with podiums of 9, seven and two storeys. The designs offered 435 properties, 2,750m² of business house and a few outlets.

However final week (26 January) planning committee members on the LLDC unanimously voted to comply with the recommendation of planning officers and reject the proposed scheme because of its ‘dangerous’ mixture of flat sizes and overbearing top, massing and density.

A spokesperson for the LLDC stated: ‘The committee acknowledged the advantages that the redevelopment of this difficult web site in Bromley-by-Bow would deliver, together with the supply of inexpensive housing.

‘However this was not ample to outweigh the dangerous impacts generated by an extreme quantity of improvement at this web site, together with the creation of a poor-quality residing setting and opposed affect on neighbouring housing, amongst different points.’

A planning report for the scheme had stated the towers would ‘fail to respect the native context and would seem as extreme additions, visually intrusive, oppressive and over-dominant in views from across the web site’.

It added that the extreme density and scale of the buildings would end in a ‘poor-quality residing setting’, notably in relation to the scale and high quality of personal amenity house and creation of a ‘hostile public realm’.

The issues had been additionally echoed by a design evaluate panel which regarded on the scheme in Might 2020. The panel recommended the ‘distinguished structure’ and ‘high-quality residential lodging’ however stated it was unable to assist the event because of its ‘critical reservations’ about density.

‘The density of improvement is extreme, compromising livability: the way it will truly be skilled by the big variety of individuals – together with youngsters – who reside there,’ it stated. ‘435 properties are anticipated; such depth will inevitably exert pressures on what’s a small web site in a hostile location’.

The design evaluate panel, on behalf of the LLDC, was chaired by planner Peter Studdert and likewise featured architect Teresa Borsuk and panorama architect Mike Martin.

Planners for the LLDC had been additionally crucial of the combination of flats, arguing that the proportion of one-bedroom flats was too excessive in comparison with two-bedroom and three-bedroom flats. They stated this was notably true for the inexpensive flats, the place 40 per cent had been one-bedroom, in comparison with 45 per cent and 15 per cent two- and three-bedroom respectively.

The issues had been shared by the native authority, Tower Hamlets Council, which identified that there have been no four-bedroom properties, regardless of these making up 15 per cent of the borough’s inexpensive housing wants. Additionally they criticised the tenure break up inside the inexpensive housing provision, as 56 per cent is intermediate, in contrast with 44 per cent inexpensive lease.

Nevertheless, the LLDC and Tower Hamlets had been each happy that the general quantity of inexpensive housing – 49 per cent by unit and 50 per cent by liveable room – was acceptable, on condition that Southern Housing Group was proposing to develop the location at a loss.

The LLDC planning committee has requested Southern Housing to work with planning officers to handle the explanations for refusal of the scheme forward of one other utility.

Patrick Duffy, director of latest enterprise at Southern Housing,  stated: ‘We’re naturally disillusioned by LLDC’s choice to refuse our utility, given the optimistic suggestions that had been provided through the utility course of and the popularity that the proposal gives very important high-quality design inexpensive properties for native individuals.

‘Nonetheless, we’ll proceed to contemplate our choices for bringing ahead this third and last section of the group’s Bow River Village improvement. The completion of Bow River Village is integral to our dedication to bringing much-needed inexpensive properties to the realm.’

Karakusevic Carson Architects has not responded to a request for remark.

Part one of many Bow River Village was designed by Frank Reynolds Architects and has already been accomplished, whereas section two, designed by JTP, is at present beneath development.

View of the location

Recommended For You